ADHD glossary · Family perspectives
Collaboration
Collaboration means working with other people on a shared piece of work, with an agreed way to contribute and make decisions. People can contribute different things, at different times, without each doing every part.
General education and practical perspectives. Editorial standards.
The practical question is: How will we make this together while keeping each person's contribution and choices visible? Task ownership concerns responsibility for a particular task. The division-of-household-labor page looks across recurring arrangements to ask who is carrying which work. Here, the focus is on decisions within one shared creation: who can propose a change, whose contribution it affects, and who decides whether to adopt it.
An example: a welcome sign for a family gathering
In this invented household, Nico proposes a welcome sign. Their partner, Avery, wants to choose the wording with them. Their child, Remy, would like to draw the border but does not want adults to redraw it. Nico's sibling, Jo, offers to check the date in the final wording, not join the whole project.
They agree to a paper sign with one message and a border. Avery and Nico will decide the message together before Remy starts the border. Remy chooses the drawing within the space they agree to use. Jo will check only the date when asked. The sign does not need unanimous approval of every pencil mark, but everyone knows which decisions are shared.
When Nico thinks of a second message, they ask Avery before changing the words and Remy before using more of the border space. The shared project has not made all contributions available for anyone to edit.
Record who can change each contribution
A collaboration note can record editing decisions rather than reproduce a project schedule. Listing what must happen first belongs in a plan; this ledger answers who gets a say when the work is changed:
Contribution: Main message
Person who offered: Nico and Avery
Decision they keep: The words they jointly want to display
How changes are decided: Both review a new message before it replaces the current one
Contribution: Drawn border
Person who offered: Remy
Decision they keep: Which drawing fills the agreed border space
How changes are decided: A request for extra message space goes back to Remy
Contribution: Date check
Person who offered: Jo
Decision they keep: Whether to offer the bounded check they accepted
How changes are decided: Jo flags a date question; this does not authorize rewriting the sign
Contribution: Display after the gathering
Person who offered: No decision yet
Decision they keep: No person is assumed to decide for all makers
How changes are decided: Ask the makers before keeping, relocating, or separating their work
For your own project, name the intended result, the contributions people offered, and the decisions they want to share. Include how a proposed change will reach the affected contributor. If Remy does not want to redraw the border around new wording, Nico and Avery can retain the original message or discuss a separate sign; they cannot call an unasked-for revision Remy's contribution.
Participation can take different forms
A child may want a real choice over one part rather than a token job that an adult later replaces. A partner may want to co-decide the plan but work alone on their contribution. A relative may offer one bounded check without becoming an ongoing project coordinator. Ask rather than assume which role they want.
Working at the same table is not necessary for every collaboration. Conversely, being nearby does not mean someone has joined the project. Ask before adding their name to a contribution or crediting them with an opinion.
What to do when the shared work changes
If a new requirement appears, identify whose contribution it affects and whether they accept the change. If one person starts revising everything, pause and revisit decision ownership. If coordination itself becomes substantial work, name that work and ask who is willing to do it.
The group can narrow the project, make separate pieces, postpone it, or stop. Before putting things away, ask what each maker wants done with their contribution. This ordinary example does not promise better relationships or more efficient work; collaboration is a chosen arrangement, not a moral requirement to do every activity together.
Related guides
Updates and corrections
Published .
Found a factual error or something unclear? Use the contact route on our Trust page. Read our research method for the evidence approach.