ADHD glossary · Family perspectives

Personal privacy

Personal privacy, in this ordinary household discussion, concerns preferences and agreements about personal information, belongings, and space: what someone wants others to ask about before reading, moving, or sharing. This page does not define legal rights, family authority, confidentiality duties, or technical data protection.

General education and practical perspectives. Editorial standards.

The practical question is: What exactly are we agreeing may be seen, used, or shared, and with whom? A personal boundary can state a broad limit. A privacy discussion identifies the particular information, object, audience, and use involved. Permission for one use is not treated here as an automatic invitation to every other use.

An example: a photograph of a finished project

In this invented household, Suri has finished a model village and their parent, Dev, wants to send a photograph to a relative. Suri is happy for the relative to see the village but does not want a nearby notebook included. Their sibling, Bea, made one building and wants to know whether their name will be mentioned.

They discuss the proposed photograph before taking or sending it. Their arrangement is specific: photograph the village without the notebook; send it to the one relative they named; describe it as a shared project without naming Bea. They do not assume this also covers a public post or a later use.

The agreement does not guarantee that a recipient or service will keep an image private. If that uncertainty changes whether someone wants to participate, the household can choose not to send it. The example is about choosing the intended sharing, not asserting control over every copy.

Make the agreement concrete

For an ordinary sharing decision, ask five questions:

1. What is involved? Name the exact photo, note, object, or area, not “everything on the table.”
2. What use is proposed? Looking at it, moving it, making a copy, or sending it are different actions.
3. Who is the intended audience? Name the people or group; “family” may mean different people to different participants.
4. What should be left out? This might be a name, background object, caption, or personal explanation.
5. What requires asking again? A different audience, another image, or a new use can prompt another conversation.

Their invented note reads:

“One photograph of the village, without the notebook. Intended recipient: the relative we named. No names in the caption. Ask again before another use. We can decide not to send it.”

No account, upload, or private information is needed to try writing such a note for a fictional example of your own.

Shared spaces need specific conversations

A child may want a sketchbook left closed while sharing a drawing they selected. An adult may want their private appointment details left off a household calendar while sharing only when they are unavailable. Siblings using one table may need separate places for personal notes. These are different arrangements; none requires inspecting all of somebody's belongings to begin the discussion.

If a shared space cannot offer the arrangement someone wants, name the limitation rather than promise privacy the space cannot provide. Discuss another location, a different amount of information, or not sharing that item.

Revisit the scope when circumstances change

If someone asks to change the arrangement, clarify future use and what has already happened. Do not promise that a previous recipient can be made to forget information or that all copies can be recovered. A household agreement is not a technical guarantee.

This page is not secrecy advice, a safeguarding procedure, or guidance on legal recording and disclosure obligations. Those questions fall outside this ordinary P-scope example and require separate qualified review. Stop using the template if the question becomes one of those issues.

Updates and corrections

Published .

Found a factual error or something unclear? Use the contact route on our Trust page. Read our research method for the evidence approach.